As We Wait for Vaccines, Don't Let COVID Fatigue Set in
Evidence shows that as willpower wanes, people are more likely to make decisions that can pose risks to themselves.
Incredibly, a whole year has passed since the first emergence of COVID-19. What looked like a temporary inconvenience at first is turning into a permanent fixture that might forever change life as we knew it before 2020.
But how long will people continue to comply with the measures necessary to overcome the virus as complacency and fatigue set in?
As new outbreaks have cropped up in New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland in recent weeks, governments have responded with stringent new measures to prevent the spread of the virus, including border closures, mask mandates and temporary lockdowns.
Are these isolated cases, or signs of an increasingly exhausted public growing less tolerant of restrictions with the knowledge of vaccines on the way?
And could this kind of complacency cost us the war against the virus?
The Importance of Psychology to Winning the War
The absence of medical science would surely lose us the war against COVID-19. But psychology is no doubt if we’re going to win it.
What ultimately stops a highly infectious disease is people’s compliance with the measures that governments put in place. This is why self-isolation, social distancing, curfews, good hygiene, and face masks have become ingrained in our daily lives over the past year.
One might think these hard-learned behaviours will become habits that stick no matter how long the pandemic continues. But behavioural science warns us that dashed hopes, uncertainty, changing goalposts and broken credibility can play a major role in how long people strictly follow rules and maintain good habits.
A Battle of Willpower
The sacrifices that governments are continuing to ask people to make require self-control. Willpower has been likened to a mental muscle that can tire. There is some evidence that exercising self-control takes so much mental effort, .
Evidence also shows that as willpower wanes, people are more likely to make decisions that can pose risks to themselves and harm others.
Participants in , for instance, were asked to perform a tedious task. For some of these participants, the task was also designed to require more concentration. These participants later registered a higher willingness to take risks.
However, they do show us how important psychology is when assessing people’s abilities to comply with rules that go against their natural instincts and inclinations.
Shifting Goalposts and False Hope
Performing a task, like following complex COVID rules and regulations, also depends on clear and achievable objectives. Vague or shifting goalposts and a lack of feedback on people’s progress toward a specific goal .
Shifting goalposts and mixed messages have been a consistent feature of governmental responses to COVID-19 — not just in Australia, but everywhere.
This is partly related to our evolving understanding of the virus and the most effective ways to stem transmissions. For instance, there has been much debate about the effectiveness of face masks, which has .
Governments have also made plenty of mistakes, such as providing to the public or to the migrant community.
All of this has can affect compliance. From a psychological standpoint, consistency plays an important role when it comes to people’s trust in authority and their willingness to follow rules, particularly when it comes to the type of long-term response required in a pandemic.
What people are willing to sacrifice also depends on their expectations. This is why optimism can be such a powerful tool to help people get through hard times. But if optimistic messages from governments begin to sound like false hope, this can have the opposite effect. Dejection can cause many to abandon good habits.
Balancing the Message
As we enter a new year with no end in sight to the pandemic, many will surely wonder what the endgame is. Yes, vaccines will hopefully bring a return to normal life, but this may take considerable time. We may be living with COVID restrictions longer than we think.
What is clear is that government messaging continues to matter greatly. People need to be informed of how we are traveling in the fight against the virus and how long the journey will take.
But this kind of messaging must be done with extreme care. Governments face the unenviable task of communicating enough positivity to motivate people to continue the fight without eventually losing credibility when unexpected bad news or delays occur.
With many more months of lockdowns, mask mandates, and quarantining in our futures, we all need to manage our expectations appropriately, too. We need to remember the long game is what matters.
(Robert Hoffman is a Professor of Economics and Chair of Behavioural Business Lab, RMIT University, and Swee-Hoon Chuah is a Professor of Economics, at University of Tasmania)
(This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for them. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article here.)
(Subscribe to FIT on Telegram)
Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter Now.